Facebook

Supreme Court takes up Religious Freedom case that could change things across the entire county.

The decision to take this case is as important as the case itself. From the article, ” Government money going to religious schools doesn’t necessarily violate the First Amendment, but appeals courts are split on whether excluding such schools from programs like Montana’s violates religious freedom, which is likely part of the reason why the Supreme Court agreed to hear Espinoza’s case.”

This is a huge deal for those that want to send their children to religious schools without the state interfering.

“Justice Brett Kavanaugh pressed the Montana DOR’s lawyer, Adam Unikowsky, on the distinction between religious and secular schools versus schools representing different religions. Suppose the state said we’re going to allow the scholarship funds to be used for secular schools or protestant schools but not for Jewish schools or Catholic schools. Unconstitutional?” Kavanaugh asked. After Unikowsky replied that it would be, Kavanaugh went on: “So what’s different when you say the scholarship funds can be used for secular schools but not for Protestant, Jewish, Catholic or other religious schools because of the religious status?”

Content like this is only made possible by contributions from readers like you. If everyone who enjoys our website helps fund it, we can expand and improve our coverage further. Plus you’ll get exclusive accsess to Family-Only original content and some free stuff! Join the RightWay Family today by donating @ patreon below: From this link below you can join a monthly patron tier, or make a custom donation of your choice to support The RightWay.
https://www.patreon.com/join/TheRightWay?

Support The RightWay;
Buy Us a Cup of Coffee

Home Page

Tammy Seymour Dillingham